DGP Directs Action, Yet No FIR? Questions Over Palghar Police Response in POCSO Complaint

Palghar: Questions are being raised over the alleged delay by Palghar Police in registering an FIR in connection with a complaint of alleged sexual abuse of a 10-year-old girl, despite the Maharashtra Director General of Police (DGP) office directing the Palghar Superintendent of Police (SP) to take necessary action.

The allegation has been made by the complainant, Laxmi Shivram Bhosale alias Sajida Sarfaraz Ansari, who claims that despite directions from the DGP office, she has not yet been informed of any FIR being registered in the case.

According to the complaint submitted to the DGP on August 14, 2026, the minor allegedly informed her family about the incident on August 4. The family subsequently attempted to contact Palghar Police and also approached the emergency helpline 112. The complainant said the call was registered under reference number CFS38537073.

The complaint further states that the minor underwent a medical examination at the Palghar Rural Hospital. The family has also alleged that they did not receive the expected cooperation when they approached the Palghar Police Station to lodge a complaint. They have additionally alleged that the minor was allegedly spoken to in a threatening manner.

Against this backdrop, the complainant sought an appointment with the DGP on August 19 and submitted supporting documents, including the earlier complaint, the 112 reference number, medical records and copies of media reports concerning the matter.

Following the request, the DGP office forwarded the complaint-related email to the Palghar SP’s office, directing it to take “necessary action and inform the complainant/sender accordingly.” The complainant was also advised to contact the Palghar SP’s office for further follow-up.

However, the complainant claims that despite the directions from the DGP office, she has not been informed about the registration of an FIR in the alleged sexual abuse case.

“If serious allegations have been made by a minor, a complaint has been registered through the 112 emergency helpline and a medical examination has also been conducted, then why is there a delay even after the DGP office directed the Palghar SP to take necessary action? Where should we go for justice?” the complainant’s family has questioned.

The allegations in the complaint are yet to be independently established, and the matter requires a fair and lawful investigation. However, as the complaint concerns a minor, the family has demanded prompt, impartial and legally appropriate action.

The focus is now on what concrete action the Palghar SP’s office takes following the DGP office’s directions and when the complainant is formally informed about the action taken in the case.

Share News

  • The News Analyser

    Honest & Fearless journalism unveiling deep insights beyond the headlines.

    Stand with independent media. Every contribution matters.  UPI: 9769863124 (All UPI Apps)

    Thank you for your support 🙏

    Related Posts

    OBC Yuva Aghadi seeks caste census, dynamic reservation system and free education up to PhD

    Pratiksha Chavan submits detailed memorandum to President, PM and Maharashtra government; seeks biennial review of social and educational…

    Read more

    Jitendra Chauhan Law College Trains Paralegal Volunteers to Combat Drug Abuse

    Awareness programme highlights prevention strategies, health risks, legal safeguards and emergency response mechanisms Mumbai: With the growing concern…

    Read more

    Leave a Reply

    Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

    You cannot copy content of this page